The best 0-2 team in the West Coast Conference

For six minutes early in the second half Monday, the Portland Pilots struggled to do much of anything right at either end of the court.

In those six minutes, the Pilots missed eight consecutive shots, turned the ball over three times, and went from trailing the Santa Clara Broncos 40-37 to trailing 52-37 with 12:20 remaining.

Still time for a comeback, right?

Portland twice climbed back to within three points, the second time when Thomas van der Mars converted a three-point play to make it 58-55 with 4:38 left, but that was as close the Pilots could get.

Final score: Santa Clara 76, Portland 68.

“Santa Clara was very disciplined offensively,” Pilots coach Eric Reveno said. “Do you remember them taking a bad shot, really? Like, late clock?”

Actually, with 5:25 left in the first half, Broncos junior guard Brandon Clark put up a 3-point shot that bruised the backboard.

That was a bad shot.

Aside from that, Santa Clara put on quite a show on offense, especially from beyond the 3-point arc where the Broncos knocked down 12 of 23 shots. The Broncos’ three starting guards — Jared Brownridge, Evan Roquemore, and Clark — scored 20 points each and went a combined 11 of 17 from long range.

The Pilots made only 2 of 11 shots from 3-point range. They also had 13 turnovers and one particularly frigid stretch at the free-throw line with about eight minutes left when they missed three straight, including the front end of two one-and-one opportunities.

Throw in Saturday’s 87-81 overtime loss to San Francisco, and the Pilots are 0-2 in West Coast Conference play with the Pacific Tigers coming to town Thursday for a 7 p.m. tip at the Chiles Center.

“Your margin for error in this conference is so slim,” Reveno said. “Mark my word. I’ll be surprised if there’s not an upset every week on any given night in the conference. It’s going to happen. It’s just a tough league … and you’ve got to scratch and claw and try to protect home court.

“I feel better than I did after Saturday night, because we made tough, physical plays. I felt we got bullied and beat up a little on Saturday. Tonight, we out-rebounded Santa Clara (43-27) and we got the ball inside and … making tough, physical plays will always give you a chance.”

Van der Mars finished with a game-high 23 points on 10-for-15 shooting, while Kevin Bailey added 19 points and Ryan Nicholas had 12 points and 13 rebounds for the Pilots.

-30-

Another home game, another near miss

Trailing 65-62 with 3:12 to play in the game, the Pilots got the ball to Tanner Riley behind the three-point arc for a potential game-tying shot.

Riley eyed the basket and looked as if he might let it fly.

Instead, he held the ball, looking a bit unsure what to do.

“SHOOT IT!” Pilots coach Eric Reveno hollered from the bench, giving voice to what many in the crowd of 1,043 at the Chiles Center were thinking.

Riley, the senior guard, was understandably hesitant.

The Pilots had just missed four attempts from long range in the last four and a half minutes, and although the Montana State defense was giving Riley room to shoot, the situation begged the question: Was this the shot the Pilots wanted at this point of the game?

Clearly, Riley heard Reveno, whose voice carried better than usual on this afternoon —  the first Sunday after Finals Week when the normally robust student section was virtually vacant and many of those in attendance sat quietly as they waited for a reason to make noise.

Just then, Riley re-set and fired.

Tied game?

No, the shot missed and the Pilots never got closer than three points the rest of the way.

Final score: Montana State 72, Portland 69.

Riley misfiring with 3:12 to play did not decide the game. Portland had several other opportunities in crunch time to seize the upper hand, but that one sequence with Riley typified how most the game went for the Pilots, who struggled to find any kind of rhythm at the offensive end and were often hesitant in situations that called for more assertiveness.

The Bobcats (4-5) deserve credit for the job they did defensively against junior center Thomas van der Mars, holding the Pilots’ second-leading scorer to nine points on 4-for-7 shooting, while also making it difficult for anyone else for Portland to get much of anything close to the basket.

“Montana State did a great job of giving us the shots that they wanted to,” Reveno said. “They looked at us on film and they gave 33 percent 3-point shooters wide-open shots. If we got hot, they would adjust, but we didn’t, so they were able to pack it in … and we weren’t able to find something that would get us anything high-percentage.

“The strategy was to play defense like we’ve been playing, get stops, and get out in transition. We knew that they would change defenses a bunch. They’ve done it this year to teams where they disrupt you by changing defenses, and they disrupted us the same way.”

For the game, the Pilots shot 45.6 percent (26 of 57) from the field, and 30.4 percent (7 of 23) from three-point range.

The 23 attempts from long range matched a season high first set in a 79-73 loss at Oregon State.

“Those shots are shots that you look at and you say, ‘Yeah, they’re great if they go in,’ but then they don’t,” Reveno said. “Then what do we do when all of a sudden you have two or three wide-open shots in a row? Do you have something to go to or someone to go to and get the shot you want? That’s how we didn’t respond.”

The loss left the Pilots at 6-4 with two non-conference games remaining before Portland opens West Coast Conference play on Dec. 28 at home against San Francisco.

“The elephant in the room is the West Coast Conference,” Reveno said. “That’s what’s looming. We’ve got to get better for that, so I don’t really care much about Montana State. It’s all about what we can do to get better. If this helps us over the long haul or helps in two weeks …

“Two weeks from today, we’ll have one game in the WCC under our belt. If this game can help us win three or four more games in conference play, then it was well worth it. So, that’s my job — to make it so that we can learn from this game and get better.”

 -30-

How ’bout them Trail Blazers?

Heading east on Scholls Ferry Road, I started running through some of the questions I wanted to ask Pilots coach Eric Reveno at the end of Wednesday’s practice.

As the road swung to the north near Washington Square, I stopped for a red light where Scholls Ferry intersects with the northbound Highway 217 off ramp.

That’s when I spotted him.

He was standing at the top of the exit ramp on the shoulder, facing the oncoming traffic and away from me, so I couldn’t see his face or what was written on the piece of cardboard that he was holding with both hands.

What caught my attention on this particularly cold December morning were the guy’s black and red jacket with a big Trail Blazers emblem on the back and his Santa hat. I mean, how often do you see people working freeway off ramps sporting a Santa hat?

I thought it was a nice touch.

As the lights changed, a women in an SUV waiting to turn left onto Scholls Ferry Road looked as if she was digging in her purse or the middle console for something to give the guy. I started to roll through the intersection and turned my attention back to the road, so I don’t know if any goodwill actually changed hands or not at that stop light.

If I had been in the SUV, I might have read the guy’s sign, but that’s about it. Beyond that, I would have busied myself with something inside the car, fiddled with the radio, stared straight ahead at the traffic light, or anything to avoid eye contact with the guy in the Santa hat with the cardboard sign.

Or maybe I would have been drawn to look at him because of that hat.

Turning at the next light onto 217, I wondered if the guy with the Santa hat was a genuine Blazers fan or if the coat was just that — a coat. If he was a fan, what did he think of his team’s 15-3 start? How about that improved bench? Which channel has tonight’s Blazers-Thunder game?

I don’t expect people who spend the majority of their waking hours on the street to know such answers, but maybe this guy would have surprised me. Maybe he would have launched into an analysis of Terry Stotts’ fourth-quarter substitution pattern and the virtues of home-court advantage in the Western Conference.

He also might not know if the ball the Blazers’ play with is pumped or stuffed.

I consider myself a charitable person, but I’m not often impulsive. Some of my favorite charities include Goodwill Industries and De Paul Treatment Centers. My wife and I also donate annually to the University of Oregon, which is more an expression of gratitude than trying to the needy.

It’s rare, but there are days when the spirit moves me to put a dollar in someone’s coffee can. The last time was a women sitting on the sidewalk outside a Starbucks downtown.

I don’t even remember what was written on her piece of cardboard.

One time, I was on my way to meet some friends downtown for coffee and I saw a guy at the corner of NW 14th and Everett holding a sign that read: “Homeless veteran.”

When I met my friends, I told them about the guy and the sign and asked them: “How long does somebody have to be on the streets before they lose their amateur status?”

We all see the people on street corners and the freeway off ramps holding signs, because they’re everywhere. No matter where I see them,  I’m reminded of the Stephen King short story “Blind Willie” about a Vietnam veteran who commutes from Connecticut to New York City and makes hundreds of dollars a day while disguised as a blind beggar. There’s more to the story than that, but that’s what I remember.

Behind every cardboard sign, there’s a story. Some of the stories are better than others, I’m sure. Heck, there’s probably a 12-part, ready-for-prime-time series standing with a sign on an off ramp somewhere in this city at this very moment.

I don’t have time to find that person.

I’m trying to get to a basketball practice.

The Times, They Are A Changin’

There was no newspaper on the driveway this morning.

Home delivery of the paper was recently cut back to four days a week. Actually, three days a week, plus a “bonus” Saturday home delivery. So, it’s not unusual to go outside some days and find nothing. I’m not comfortable with the new set up, but I’m learning to accept that this is the way it’s going to be for the foreseeable future.

But today is Sunday.

If there is one day of the week that I look forward to reading the paper more than others, it’s Sunday. It’s a given that the Sunday paper consistently has better content than the papers on other days. It’s reflected in the price, too.

When I saw there was no paper on the driveway, my first reaction was, “OK, Lori must have taken the paper inside already.”

Wrong.

Calling to complain wasn’t an option. If Lori had been home, I might have asked her to call, but she was at the mall with the kids, shopping for clothes for our youngest, 14-year-old Joseph, who has gone through a recent growth spurt and is now taller than his mom.

Running out and buying a paper wasn’t an option, either. The Pilots had a 1 p.m. game against Southern Utah and I was more interested in getting to the Chiles Center than I was in reading about Alabama-Auburn or Central Catholic-Tigard. Plus, if I’ve learned anything since the paper cut back on home delivery, I know that I can survive a day without a paper.

Again, I’m not comfortable not having a daily paper, but I accept that as a new reality.

Yes, almost all the information that is in the paper is available online. Sometimes I get the feeling that the paper would prefer that I access content online rather than read it the old-fashioned way, but I’m not wired that way. I’m not that kind of reader. I enjoy the physical newspaper more than navigating a website. I like that I can put the paper down and then pick it up later.

Same goes for the magazines that I subscribe to. All of them are offered in a web-based or Kindle format, but I don’t want to read them that way. It’s just a personal preference. And I know I’m not the only one who feels that way.

I still read plenty of stuff online, mostly out-of-town papers and websites such as The Onion and Deadspin. But when it comes to the local paper, I go out of my way to avoid clicking on any of the paper’s online content. I’m afraid that the more I click, the more inclined the paper may be to continue down the path of less and less home delivery.

I don’t want to encourage them.

It’s hard to imagine a time when home delivery is reduced to one day a week or when print editions no longer exist, but maybe that’s where we’re heading.

I wonder if it’s too late to make a call?